Replies to post #256715 on Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[4gemz]

Janice's reply from post 256495;

By the way, why did the SEC NOT suspend SLJB as so many here were saying 3 months ago? I believe you were one of those people.

You'd be wrong about that. So, shall I explain it for the 176th time?

176 times? Would that not be considered spam and thus a violation of TOU?

4gemz