Replies to post #254286 on Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[two-card-monty]

binzur, with all respect, you're wrong. A certificate of merger must be filed with the secretary of state for a merger to have happened. Before that can even happen SLJB common must approve a merger by proxy. Where is the proxy?

The "fact" is that SLJB is an empty shell NV corp. Loftwerks is the offshore private corp that went private after selling its public vehicle to Sulja Ltd.

Here's your proof, first the disclosure of acquiring only the public vehicle, not the company. That is called a 'going private buyout/SEC Rule 13e),

Sulja Finalizes Acquisition of LFWK Vehicle

WINDSOR, ON -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 06/01/2006 -- Sulja Bros., Ltd. (PINKSHEETS: LFWK) today announced that its new ownership of the LoftWerks (LFWK), Inc. public vehicle has been finalized by the Board of Directors, and their legal counsel, the Law Firm of Gottbetter and Partners, LLC...

secondly, there is no cert of merger or proxy for a merger.

your opinions are pure speculation. Read all the filings you sent me.

[two-card-monty]

binzur, in fact you've defined the scam here. Sulja Ltd only acquired the LFWK public vehicle, not the Loftwerk's business operation & assets (company). This is a going private buy-out. Loftwerks went private after selling its o/s to Sulja Ltd.
Then they filed a name change to match the NV corp trading those shares to con the public they were the same company. If you'll recall they pumped this up with false claims of a merger to con the niave and unknowledgable. The amendments you point to are Loftwerks filings. Loftwerks, after going private, changed its name to one matching SLJB's. Loftwerks has no "symbol" because it sold its public shares to Sulja Ltd that trades them as SLJB now.

Fact; SLJB is in fact Loftwerks, Inc after the name change ammenments in July and the filing with the SEC on a name and symbol change which changed LFWK to SLJB.

[Ripnrob]

Finally it is my opinion that there was a stock transfer of some kind that may have conveyed Sulja Canada ownership to the Sulja Nevada corporate shell. I have this from multiple sources and many of the "in the company know" longs seem very confident that this is the case. This was done after the crash on November 16 to try to right the wrong! JMHO!
Binzur


So how could PV have AF's for a stock that was an empty shell. Before the 16th.

Good DD Binzur you just proved this was a scam