Replies to post #93452 on ERHC Energy Inc (ERHE)

[rambus]

thanks Electick

[RUBY1100]

Electic whats your GUESS on time frames

now with Drilling not till mid 2008 for Addax and best guess early 2008 for APC SEO may have some more time to Squeeze our potential suitors for more $$$$$$

your thoughts

[littleBitmoore1]

Thank you very much for this post, Electick.

lbm1

[umbra]

You have always spoken of assets and for the most part I have always found your logic and explanations to be flawless.

You know as well as I do that ERHC is sitting on, as a partner, huge assets in untapped hydrocarbons.

To my way of thinking, the shares each of us own are a reflection of those yet to be quantified assets.

I can assure you that were we to make out our last wills and testaments, our shares in ERHC would be treated as an asset.

This might be an overly simple approach and not as professionally spelled out the way you might like or are used to.

At this juncture in my life I take more comfort in keeping it that way.

[Manti]

Thanks for staying in touch E. I've been thinking a bit lately (dangerous, I know) about the highly touted seo's incentives to sell a portion of his erhe shares. Unlike some here, I don't think that he gives a ***** ***** about us. I consider anyone who is holding on hopes that he will just give additional deals to erhe have misplaced those hopes. All I see him doing is protecting and perfecting what rights erhe already has(Which are ample enough at thes prices). I don't see him adding to them without making us pay dearly. I also see a US company as cramping his style. That's why Starcrest and Feltang. I'm thinking that those companies are perhaps giving extra ammo to those trying to convince him to relinquish control of erhe... the more deals he makes on the side trying to do business 'his' way the less he is performing his fiduciary responsibilities with erhe, and the more pressure the sec and US law can apply. Am I partly correct? tia