Replies to post #19442 on Wave Systems Corp. (fka WAVXQ)

[24601]

With respect to private placements, my non-expert understanding is that under reg FD a company may selectively disclose material, nonpublic information to people like the accredited investors in a prospective private placement as long as the recipients of the information explicitly agree to hold it as confidential. The recipients do not have to promise not to trade on it; that is not reg FD's focus. They just have to acknowledge that they are receiving the information in confidence.

My surmise is that this requirement that the recipients of such information acknowledge its special character presumably lays the predicate for the separate focus of the rules against trading on insider information. I don't know whether accredited investors who hold such information in confidence are considered as de facto insiders or, instead, like tippees of insiders -- or what difference it makes, for that matter. I don't know what would permit such accredited investors to trade the underlying stock the way we surmise that Bain did.

Even accepting that under reg FD it's okay to disseminate roadshow information on selective bases as long as the recipients agree to treat it as confidential, I don't know what permits the people who receive such information for the purpose of a placement of unregistered shares to use that information to trade existing, registered shares in the secondary market.

[Snackman]

SPIN let me refresh yours and everyone else's memory. There are 3 people that monitor this board. I am only one person. I do not delete every post. I wish you, and everyone else, would please stop condemming me for every deleted post.

I have no idea about riptide's post. If it was an attacking post or had vulgarity in it or was not civil it was deleted. But it was not deleted by me. I hope everyone understands what I said in this post and please get off my back. I am human just like you all, and I don't appreciate everyone blaming me for every deleted post. O.K.?

[24601]

SPIN: As I intimated in post #19440, Reg FD and the strictures against trading on inside information both address material, nonpublic information, but on different bases. In simplistic terms, the rules against trading on such information address the exploitation of leaks and reg FD addresses leaking, itself.

So read this again:

With respect to private placements, my non-expert understanding is that under reg FD a company may selectively disclose material, nonpublic information to people like the accredited investors in a prospective private placement as long as the recipients of the information explicitly agree to hold it as confidential. The recipients do not have to promise not to trade on it; that is not reg FD's focus. They just have to acknowledge that they are receiving the information in confidence.

My surmise is that this requirement that the recipients of such information acknowledge its special character presumably lays the predicate for the separate focus of the rules against trading on insider information. I don't know what would permit the people who receive such information for the purpose of a placement of unregistered shares to use that information to trade existing, registered shares in the secondary market.