Your post is gone but I'll answer anyway
The statement about the highway project maybe grandstanding a bit, but it’s not the truth embellished but rather embellished with truth. I suppose one could be misled by the truth if it were a desire and a place you wanted to be.
With the other items you mentioned I agree, they should be explained further.
The AV merger just doesn’t seem to fit the time line and the $80 million needs to be defined.
Share buy back is a very relevant and I assume will be addressed with cannons blasting come Fri.
As far as the NASDAQ floor burp, it’s not the first time that mistake has been published within a pr. To me it’s nothing more than a point of curiosity how that mistake enters publication.