Well youre certainly right to put 6 years of data up against 22. Conveniently cut out the worst of it all. Very scientific. I wonder what the majority of the world would think of that.
Kind of like a politician running for office with a long track record of indescretions but your slogan is 'he hasnt screwed up in the last 6 months.'
Discussing other companies is meaningless since I know nothing about them.
I do know some who have kicked management out only to have the company boot up and the SP skyrocket.
How about knowing when to leave being in the best interests of the company? Many titans have had CEOs walk away and the business boomed afterwards.
Ill stick to my stance. With the 12 'wins' remember the only thing Linda did right was to hire a lawyer. Go back and see how Linda was handling it. Telling the SEC how she never got the letter even though it was signed for??? Next during the case she had something like 7 transgressions over ruled. Then she finally figured it out that she couldnt handle it and what happened, here we are. But it sure as hell isnt because of Linda. I mean she dug that hole in the first place.
But stick to your guns and we'll see what happens. But Im pretty sure that if Linda had stepped down in say 2015, we'd be much further along. Dont you want the best possible person running the company?