Court cases can often have unexpected results and often hinge on technical arguments with unexpected results. The laws of physics on the other hand have no get-out clauses and Holcomb's nonsense is expressly forbidden,past, present and future. If you are so sure it works as advertised what have you got to lose by asking the opinion of a professional scientist? Or maybe you know it doesn't work and you are just maintaining the pretense to try to save your investment?