Your "explanation" is fatally flawed, therefore does not describe why straightwards theory is wrong. It is fatally flawed because it states and assumes that, in your words:
"the truth is that VP is in a legal battle to receive justice for the infringement abuse they have suffered."
Don't look now....but you CANNOT and MAY NOT state that there was ANY infringement or that justice needs to be served in that regard or that vplm suffered. WHY?.....because it has NEVER BEEN PROVEN or even shown that said infringement has indeed taken place. Therefore that IS merely YOUR ASSUMPTION and of course, suffering and justice serving follows along. Now THAT IS A FACT....IMMUTABLE.... and there's no room for argument!
It also demonstrates that your belief that you "STAND ON THE TRUTH" must be one of those David Blaine levitation tricks...BECAUSE YOU CANNOT STAND ON A FALLACY.
It also demonstrates that when peeps say "facts are facts", what they really mean is facts might be facts and could be facts but when you are within 50' of the Vplm msg board, facts are almost everything and anything but.
You go on to ask the question: "will they recieve justice?" is moot because your premise is a non sequitur.
The experts who opine on the patents, all have built in conflicts of interest, just like the USPTO and the PTAB proved.
badabingbadaboom
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
