InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

lovethatgreen

07/10/24 3:29 PM

#176854 RE: mikepgator #176853

This is the writers of these blog and Twitter posts that don't understand that every single word and phrase is dissected by readers and it doesn't take much to send some folks sideways with interpretation

If that genotoxicity test had shown any problems whatsoever they wouldn't have submitted for fucks sake
icon url

kayak_wench

07/10/24 3:33 PM

#176856 RE: mikepgator #176853

Yes! But dang it, why did they feel the need to add the extra phrase 'after gelation'. One could reply because that is true. The product is pulled from a syringe stored in the chiller. I believe they pre-loaded it in the chiller to keep the product from becoming more solid before it can be injected. There is a period once injected where the product is still liquid enough to migrate. A big question that had to have been answered in the rabbit study was how long that period was and how far it can travel in the timeframe.

Again I feel that has to be a very short period and not very far or we would have seen signs of the migration in the treatment of pets by now. And it definitely can't travel as far as solid spheres can travel (these have gone from a location place to the entire other end of a body!!). So radiogel is way safer than other brachytherapy products out there. I just don't want another hoop put in front of us at this point.

BTW, I am looking forward to John Hopkins publishing their rabbit study details. That will be well after the IDE submission time has been reached, but I would like to read about these details myself.