InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

want2retire

06/18/24 7:46 PM

#278072 RE: DimesForShares #278070

Come now. One need not go back far in one’s post history to find nearly endless musings about what could potentially go wrong. Why any progress should be quickly thwarted with concerns raised about the future.

Not accepting the risk presented by short sellers is not the same as a conclusive argument presented to show why they do not exist. “No sale” is a bit thin for me. I’ll need more than your hesitancy to accept forces are at play in the OTC that may not be obvious to the naked eye.

Shades of gray indeed. We cannot see, touch and feel everything to ensure it’s true and/or exists. Nuance is certainly needed and required.

We should cringe over the potential of a blown tire on a refrigerated truck and sleep with a light on wondering if anyone will actually want to buy spider silk but when it comes to short sellers and MMs impacting trading patterns, “no sale” should suffice?

No sale

W2R
icon url

WebSlinger

06/18/24 7:46 PM

#278073 RE: DimesForShares #278070

<< The SEC Notice of Effectiveness of Amendments was only to incorporate the latest quarterly reports into the preliminary S1-A and did not mean that dilution was at hand. >>

That is totally incorrect.
Bearish
Bearish
icon url

rayovac812

06/19/24 11:19 AM

#278092 RE: DimesForShares #278070

Check out Beecham’s estimate that the silk produced in this latest round (325 pounds of cocoons) exceeds 100 kilos, a fantastical exaggeration of how efficiency of silk production might be upped by nearly 50%.



You call 50% exaggeration, and proceed to use the many many as if everyone is talking about the shorts? You are the boards worst at exaggeration, and over these many years I gave you many examples. You have no room to speak on others getting something wrong, but here you are getting defensive about playing the role of a shorts tool.

KBLB’s checkered history of announcing production ramping up followed by a lack of communication and transparency when things don’t go as planned to me suggests that investors don’t trust Thompson as much as they used to. That’s the simple explanation.



Saying trust is being built up again, doesn't negate saying things like this. Checkered history, lack of communications, and transparency, are not what is happening now. You say this and things like it over and over and over, not an exaggeration. You don't know how to shut up and let the good times roll.

Your trust issues get turned on you. I do not trust people that have shown to not trust people, when if given enough time, the folks you don't trust end up accomplishing everything they set out to accomplish. Results always define the individual, and Kim Thompson will not be the exception to that rule.

You are the problem. You want everything explained and results immediately. That is where balance is lost, regardless of your desire to view yourself as living in the gray. You would kill a company with new tech issues built in...any company. Rehashing history, comms, and transparency today, says it all. You live in the black and white, and aren't taking any steps to recover. You've built your own perception and persona. A modern day karen, that doesn't know they should just watch in silence.