I didn't meet everyone there, abe, but there were no analysts present to my knowledge. I ran this by another attendee, and he said the same thing.
BTW, in regard to the full data set (in the peer reviewed paper, I presume), Missling said that we would be pleased to see the data "broken out by every arm of the study...all measures." He also threw out - in an apparent jab at Annovis (and others) - that the study participants were "all confirmed Alzheimer's patients."