Alright, FACTS, ENZC did submit a limited set of diagnostic facts for each of their AI and Clone-x patent applications. ENZC did provide toxicology report data for passing all of those with flying colors for both Clone-x products. ENZC supplied mABS design and data to Samsung for their hibernating partnership. Texas A&M was also submitted some limited data proving a working model of the ENZC research for getting approval of their two labs there in the Preclinical Research Center, one for animal and one for human research.
FACT, those labs are really expensive to lease too, no scam bothers to rent those for multiple years if they're just a scam. A&M was paid in full too.
FACT, I never debated that the release of published ENZC data wasn't shallow or near-non-existent, and they could still be a scam, but the odds of the CCC group being a scam are still on the low side. In fact, I complained about their lack of research/study data and being too slow to initiate private trials.
FACT, a research company interested in larger partners, won't push out any data that may assist in reverse-engineering and/or soft/covert theft of IP.
FACT, you lack substance, never a whit of evidence of what you say. One MD license retraction, and speculative bashes.
May well be a scam, but you sure don't know it. Silly child. Like you said, no wait, you didn't say it, you're absolute bashing to date, is WRONG.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
