InvestorsHub Logo

sortagreen

06/10/24 8:32 AM

#479044 RE: B402 #479038

We should absolutely cap the price of houses. Nationalize the lumber mills... Seize the means of production...

You know what. We used to build public housing. It was means tested. We used to subsidize the heck out of home ownership. Actually we still do, buy allowing people to write off the interest on taxes (renters have the landlord's taxes built in, but they can't write that off). But USDA used to subsidize the purchase of starter homes. I have friends still living in those 900 and 1000 foot ranches and capes, having raised families in them.

Anyone who proposes systems like that today gets shot down as a "communist". Two generations of Rush Limbaugh and Fox news fans have fucked this country completely up. Yeah well, you grew it, you chew it, hillbilly. You fucking hate us... I no longer give a shit.

blackhawks

06/10/24 10:48 AM

#479058 RE: B402 #479038

Without a link I'll go out on the shortest of limbs. The author did NOT conclude, from a preponderance of factors, that the Dems were responsible for most of what is in the 'snapshot'.

It’s a complex issue influenced by various economic factors, and these statistics provide a snapshot

Time for your Emily Litella; 'oh that's very different, never mind.'

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/americans-are-frustrated-by-housing-prices-ahead-of-the-2024-election

Biden, a Democrat, acknowledged the pain many are feeling in his State of the Union address earlier this month and in his budget proposal released on Monday.

The president wants to fund the building and preservation of 2 million housing units — a meaningful sum, but not enough to solve the shortage. He also proposed a tax credit worth up to $10,000 to homebuyers. Over the past three years, he has increased rental assistance to 100,000 households.

“The bottom line is we have to build, build, build,” Biden said Monday in a speech to the National League of Cities. “That’s how we bring down housing costs for good.”

Rapidly climbing home prices were also a festering problem under Trump, who first achieved celebrity status as a real estate developer. While president, Trump called for limiting construction in the suburbs. He claimed during the 2020 election that Biden’s policies to spur building and affordability would “destroy your neighborhood.”

During the 2018 to 2020 years of Trump’s presidency, the country’s housing shortage surged 52 percent to 3.8 million units, according to the mortgage company Freddie Mac.

The Associated Press contacted Trump’s campaign for his policy plans but did not get a response. The America First Policy Institute, a think tank promoting Trump’s vision, said the key is to cut government borrowing to reduce mortgage rates. The former president has pledged to reduce deficits, but an analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget shows that his policies in office will have likely added more than $8 trillion to the national debt.

“The best way for us to improve access to homeownership for young people is to get interest rates back down, not to provide subsidies that cause housing unaffordability to worsen,” said Mike Faulkender, chief economist at the institute.

Lower rates might play well with voters, but most economists say they would at best offer temporary financial relief. Purchase prices would likely adjust upward in response to greater demand from falling rates.

Construction, the more enduring solution, would take years to achieve and require new rules by states and cities. The administration is trying to incentivize zoning changes, but the major choices are outside the White House’s control.

“Even as incomes are going up and the economy is doing well and inflation is coming down, people can’t buy homes,” said Daryl Fairweather, chief economist at the brokerage Redfin. “That’s like the biggest problem for Biden because it’s not one that he can solve.”

The general rule of thumb is that people should pay no more than 30 percent of their income on rent or a mortgage. A typical household looking to buy a home would have to devote 41 percent of its income to mortgage payments, according to Redfin.

There are far-reaching economic risks because of this. High housing costs can lead people to cut back spending elsewhere. Advocates said it enables landlords to neglect their properties since there is always a ready tenant.

While there is bipartisan agreement on the need for more housing, there has yet to be a significant plan that has passed the House and Senate. Biden has proposed housing aid throughout his administration that never materialized.

“Had Congress passed some of the investments that the president has called for since the beginning of the administration, had they done that three years ago, as he was advocating, we’d have affordable units coming online right now,” said Daniel Hornung, deputy director of the White House National Economic Council.