No doubt they want more options, but i would also like the option to sell my shares at a profit. So if they can do that then they can have more options themselves.
Crash, I am just thankful to all our shorts here that without them I wouldn't be accumulating cheap shares below a dollar; now much closer to 45c. It is a God given opportunity for all the good souls...well, who are helping the cancer patients see this drug soon, imo. And I think the longs are part of the legacy the Company is attempting and most probably going to achieve, imo.
I want to see BP take non dilutive position in the company. - This is key. Non dilutive cash injection of at least $250-300M from a big pharma. Any other carrots they dangle (like Oncovir partnership, etc.) should be taken with a grain of salt. They have had almost 4 years from the data lock to plan and execute this.
Notion that single minority ambulance-chasing "shareholder" can invalidate will of majority seems like tyranny. 2019 NWBO had few hundred shareholders. Today around 50K. Does judge honestly think they're too stupid to make decisions as shareholders? How is this capitalism, and not a command economy, when a judge by fiat can overrule a vote the supermajority made twice already?
After much reflection I will be voting YES to all items yet again. These options are for work already completed. No management team works for free. We are not communists.