Replies to post #459686 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[jimmy_mcyoloswag]

It will get more difficult and ridiculous to hold up negative sentiments.

[BIOChecker4]

SuckingAlpha is of no consequence to me. I couldn’t care less what is written there, especially when the articles’ authors have no background or experience in biomedical science. Ditto for SOTC.

I make my investment decisions in Anavex based on what I observe Missling doing and saying (or not doing and not saying). Based on what I see, I don’t think the guy is competent to take Anavex forward to success. As far as the science goes, in my opinion there isn’t yet definitive, reproducible evidence of efficacy. Investors other than WGTers seem to feel the same way.

Bottom fishers and speculators are welcome to gamble to their heart’s content as far as I’m concerned. Good luck to you and them. I’ll wait for solid evidence of likely clinical and commercial success before considering adding to my position. I’d rather pay up knowing the situation is significantly de-risked. And if I miss out, I don’t care. There are plenty of fish in the sea.

[kund]

It’s rather obvious that this was a paid hit piece

Like your employer paid recently to insiderfinancials pump article.

[LakeshoreLeo1953]

Does BSIG still rely upon your "strategy" to guide their
AVXL investment decisions?
Is that your solo expertise or are there additional "sure things"
you have provided to them? Let me guess NVDA @140 which was absolutely doable?

I doubt I would risk other than a video presence at meetings
if I were you and subject to scrutiny by those members.
However, that is predicated on some significantly suspect "documentation"
on your part let alone a member list straight out of Azimov.

Question....Does Dry Powder get damp in the Summer humidity?