InvestorsHub Logo

ReikoBlack

05/21/24 6:41 PM

#728316 RE: Bizreader #728303

So, what you're saying is that JPMorgan Chase did pay for the bank, the FDIC did maximize the value of the estate, and the FDIC didn't seize the bank holding company, right?

So what you're saying is that the JPMorgan Chase does not have to pay for the bank and that the FDIC does not have to respond to it's mission to maximize the value of an estate and doesn't have to pay anything for seizing a bank holding company that was illegal, is that right?]

Boris the Spider

05/21/24 7:01 PM

#728318 RE: Bizreader #728303

Biz, so what they say daily is that JPM got a 100 yr old bank and its holding company, worth hundreds of billions, for 1 billion dollars.

LOL. And that the 5th amendment is meaningless.
Think of it this way. Someone comes into your house, gives you 1 dollar, and then they own it all....even your wife kids and dog.

I know this country is hopelessly corrupt, but.......This is so preposterous and ludicrous that I cannot believe they believe it. Dumb and dumber on steroids.