Replies to post #81415 on Impact Fusion International Inc (IFUS)

[PEACHMAN]

I agree Pinocchio,IFUS is a perfect example of how a real business in the animal science arena conducts itself.

IFUS has also developed a better lower cost efficient way to deliver SGP+ to clients saving them substantially on transportation costs.

SGP+ enables ranchers and farmers who fight the daily battles of the market and reality to lower their feed cost,while providing additional benefits of no flies or smell and reduced gas emissions too.

IFUS mulch product also enabled them to eliminate pesticides and fertilizer where appropriate.

Those that support IFUS are educated and understand that IFUS was built on science and the needs of their customers.

Non-shareholder con men just borrow on stocks they do not own and pay the interest daily and hope good companies like IFUS do not survive.

They made a mistake with IFUS..

IFUS is going to thrive and build a game changing cattle feed product locally, nationally ,and internationally.

Looks like that consortium of India Business owners knew exactly what the future needs of their cattle would be to survive and thrive.

Stay around it is going to be both fun and profitable.

IFUS STRONG

[Ecomike]

Hogwash

Absolutely wrong. Mootral is a perfect example of how a real business in the animal science arena conducts itself.

You would not know a scam if you tripped over it.

Mootral is a miserable failure. One it has no issued patents, because it's active ingredients are made out of common grocery store Oranges and Garlic. There are not enough oranges and Garlic made to meet demand if it worked, while SGP+(tm) has an endless supply of mountains of raw material



IFUS SGP+ has no bacteria in it, so it does not emit methane in storage like silage and hay and SGP+(tm) does not supply methane producing Bacteria to the Moo-Cow.
Common hay and silage does release methane, 24/7 before and after the Moo-Cow eats it because the bacteria that make methane are supplied with it.



Mootral has been a 58 Million dollar tax write off experiment for private rich folks (it is not public, talk about hiding the truth!) since 2016:



According to Pitch Book they already scammed investors out 58 Million dollars since 2016.

Why do I say that? Because their own report says it does not work and they need to go back to the lab?

Due to a low allicin concentration in the Mootral powder used in this study, a relatively large amount had to be used. As Mootral is a natural product with various active compounds, an inactive placebo for the control group was not available. Therefore, it cannot be excluded, that some of the effects observed in this study are due to nutrient utilization of the product. Metabolites, whose concentrations were increased at the same timepoints when Mootral was applied are probably derived from the product itself. As the crude protein content of the powder is about 22% (Supplementary Table 1), elevated NH3-N levels are presumably related to the higher protein supply
LOL:

However, the total production rate in the supplemented group did not differ from the control group (Ahmed et al., 2021).

In Vitro means in the Cow

In Vivo means in the controlled lab vessel:

However, as our long-term study indicates, this effect appears to be transient, at least in vitro, as methane production was not significantly reduced after 12 days of supplementation.

Schilde et al. (2021) revealed that 3-NOP combined with a high concentrate ration in vivo persistently reduced methane production, while when a high forage ration was fed, methane production recovered after 3–4 months. In contrast to the short suppression of methane production in our study, the two in vivo studies using Mootral (Roque et al., 2019; Vrancken et al., 2019) detected effects over a 12-week supplementation period;

however, these two studies used higher concentrate proportions compared to our in vitro study. Therefore, further studies on the time-course of methane emissions and ruminal parameters in response to Mootral supplementation in combination with different feeding strategies in vivo and in vitro are needed to reveal whether the transient effects observed here are linked to the in vitro system or to the dietary strategy and whether they transfer to the in vivo situation.

However, this effect was not consistent over time indicating an adaption of these microorganisms to the treatment.
In addition, the application of Mootral resulted in a reduction in the relative abundance of Methanomicrobiaceae and an increase in Methanomassiliicoccales. This is in line with the finding of Ahmed et al. (2021), who observed a dose-dependent increase in the Methanomassiliicoccaceae. Interestingly, in the previous studies by Eger et al. (2018), Methanobrevibacteriaceae dominated before treatment and were reduced by Mootral application; however, this resulted in a comparable decrease in methane reduction.

Nonetheless, as with methane production, the Mootral-induced structural changes in the microbial community composition were transient, indicating an adaptation to the product.

The ability of the microbial ecosystem to adapt to dietary strategies to reduce methanogenesis is well known (Beauchemin, 2009).

It was known it would fail based on 2009 studies?

Ouch!!!!