DD, I'm not seeing the relevance of IRP regarding NWBOs application. Your link (and the link within the link) refers to
I think we would know if we are accepting RR review. Now, if somewhere it states, the MHRA review will be considered the Reference Regulator that will be used by other Regulators, I would change my mind.
Dennis... I'm wondering if this particular pathway applies to the DCVax-L MAA as it is a new medicine, and not an established one. I certainly made a similar mistake here a few days ago in citing a link that only applied to the assessment of clinical trial timelines. You'll note that the opening paragraph on your first link indicates that the guidance for international recognition procedures pertains to initiating clinical trials and "established medicines".
And in the opening paragraph detailing the IRP guidelines, it states,
So does the term "current legislation" infer a medicinal product that already has an MAA for another indication?