InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

XMaster2023

05/13/24 10:25 PM

#691291 RE: StonkMaster #691289

That would be a short’s dream. Try end of June max and the price has already started to drift up.
icon url

manibiotech

05/13/24 10:27 PM

#691294 RE: StonkMaster #691289

While you are it you can also add the usual multimonth delay because it’s NWBO
icon url

flipper44

05/13/24 10:33 PM

#691298 RE: StonkMaster #691289

I won’t yell at you. Contact MHRA. Like ChatHPT, they’ll tell you clock starts upon receipt of a valid maa. That was December 20, 2024.

Validation passed January 24. Validation confirmed March 7. They’ll tell you confirmation does not delay start of evaluation clock.

Bonus: one day before the 10q came out, Les said they’d talk about fall in May 10th 10q. They didn’t. Is Les stupid, or did something else happen?

May 9 when he spoke was exactly 80 + 60 days from December 21. It’s quite possible they thought about asking for a 60 day extension to further respond to an RFI, but instead, they got it in at first 60 day deadline. May 9, 2024.

People underplay what a time jump to fall (or even later fall depending on punctuation) Les laid upon a small audience in a semi-public beer soaked venue.

How the f could he not know a day ahead of time the 10q would not include that? Les is a mess. He knew time mattered, yet he confounded his audience. Why?

Where are fibs more likely, 10qs or fake bars?
icon url

skitahoe

05/13/24 10:34 PM

#691299 RE: StonkMaster #691289

What justifies the +60 RFI when it's clear that there was no RFI I have no idea. A company doesn't request 60 more days when they're not needed. Without them, August 3rd would be your date if based on the March 7th date. While I believe the date should be December 20th or January 24th, without a +60 RFI when no information is requested, we'd be no later than about June 24th.

I'm still hoping all this goes away by next week because we've gotten the answer, but I may be the only one left on the board that believes it.

Gary