Replies to post #220898 on DD Support Board and Research Team

[janice shell]

C'mon. Curt Kramer's been sued by the SEC at least twice before this. He's always known exactly what he was doing.

Except at the very beginning, perhaps. Back around 2006, he bought a convertible note or something--I forget the details--from the notorious Pearlasia of PAIM/ZNXT. Pearlie was diluting like crazy, and some of her formerly-loyal shareholders were getting pissed off.

She sent one of them an email saying that if he didn't like PAIM, he could just sell his stock. And that as a matter of fact, she knew someone who was interested in buying unlimited amounts. His name was Curt Kramer. And then she offered his work and personal phone numbers.

He got a lot of calls.

As for the broker-dealer thing, see:

https://www.sec.gov/about/reports-publications/investor-publications/guide-broker-dealer-registration

[1manband]

You should stop believing anything a toxic lender says. He is full of crap, and his claim of the vote for dealers has anything to do with his case is 100% wrong. The new vote was held in February 2024, which is years after the SEC starting going after, and beating, the toxic lenders. The new rule also does not change the rule that Kramer is complaining about, so the SEC's position regarding toxic lenders is unaffected. It instead is being applied to OTHER types of traders, and really has no relationship to his case at all.

Instead, it is just more intentional obfuscation by Kramer to try to drum up support for himself by fooling the stupid and ignorant, and those that hate the SEC by nature and think everything they and the government does is oppressive and wrong.