InvestorsHub Logo

Large Green

05/08/24 5:59 PM

#727493 RE: Split T #727492

Split T, here are the facts with the P&A

Split T, you said the following to poster, Pickstocks

As a matter of fact, JPM only made an initial down payment of $1,89 Billion. The hundreds of Billions of the balance is pending and waiting adjustments, including LIBOR, when the Receivers closes the Receivership. It makes no difference to me whether JPM pays me or the FDIC.

Because of Jessie Brays 63 Million golden parachute payout on a change of management I suspect his payout will be when JPM takes control in the near future.

I see from you previous post you dabbled in Fortress Stock, that certainly helps explains your position and negativity....Wow! No escrow shares. I would be jealous too.

Carry on with your nonsense as it mean nothing to me nor my friends.


____________________________________________

WaMu Purchase Assumption Agreement

WaMu Purchase Assumption Agreement-SOME NEED TO CONCENTRATE ON THE MEANING OF INITIAL PAYMENT

Maybe there should be further research by the ZERO MONIES RETURNING GROUP but first they need to understand what the term, "INITIAL PAYMENT" means

The end of the WaMu saga will NOT OFFICIALLY end UNTIL the "R" or Receivership has finally been resolved/terminated and closed with FDIC being released.

https://www.fdic.gov/foia/files/washington_mutual_p_and_a.pdf

***PDF Page 20***

ARTICLE VII

BID; INITIAL PAYMENT


$1,888,000,000.00 for the The Assuming Ban has submitted to the Receiver a positive bid of

Assets purchased and Liabilities Assumed hereunder (the "Bid Amount"). On the Payment Date, the Assuming Ban will pay to the Corporation, or the Corporation will pay to the Assuming Ban, as the case may be, the Initial Payment, together with interest on such amount (if the Payment Date is not the day following the day of Ban Closing) from and including the day following Ban Closing to and including the day preceding the Payment Date at the Settlement Interest Rate.




...

PickStocks

05/08/24 7:06 PM

#727502 RE: Split T #727492

Why….when anyone disagrees with you or friends who think billions upon billions coming back you think they did not sign off…….for some we did….and….however we do not just hold old escrows we also own coop shares….and they look great at 80+ pps….some of us did not sell off when it fifty and claimed coop no longer matter….what have you posted has been right….jpm stole the bank…. Paid 1.89…..GSA and received 600+ million on top of 30 billion and 11 billion and threw away 11 billion to a bad whale investment..

serafino1

05/09/24 9:13 AM

#727512 RE: Split T #727492

Hello Split T
I fully agree with you.
They are 6 people who never owned ESCROW, or if they did own them, then they did not give consent , they believe , that those who gave consent , would give it all up .
Or they never really owned the old WAMUs and now they refuse to believe, that there will be a handsome reward, plus a distribution of shares by the registering "coop" to be able to use NOLS in the future, which can grow from a minimum of 7B- to approx. $30B.
But the thing they hate is that they had the dove in their hands, but they opened their hand and the dove flew away.
Someone wrote, I think SUZUKI , that Judas has a double alias, which I thought some time ago.
Personally I don't have the time to read all those lies he churns out, but I think he has a job in this forum.
Good day to you

XXXX