Why do you continually answer others posts and claim to speak for shareholders?
Of course they are illegal, no one has questioned that. 'Patterns' are only admissable as supporting evidence for a proper charge, of which there is none here. Simply speculation. I myself have given copious amounts of evidence as to why there are no NSS here. But instead the information is ridiculed.
Lets see what holds up in court.
I have no idea why they signed a Consent Decree. Maybe theyre hiding something? Pretty sure thats what youre getting at.
Why did Linda sign one? What is she trying to hide?
As for the other speculations, not all comments require 100% of the words in the dictionary. You expect people to believe in NSS here without any concrete proof, why do you expect it from others.
You know what all this reeks of? Linda. Everytime you speak you betray yourself.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
