Is doesn’t appear that Linda fought too vigorously attempting to disprove those allegations. It also appears that DBSCAM’em got off because the rules for these matters were changed.
That’s damn lucky, and in the end DBSCAM’em came out the other end, but those facts about Linda remain uncontested.
That is quite a CEO they have, but you already know that, better than anyone else I bet
Very nice. Has nothing to do with the discussion at hand.
One would think that as a 'shareholder' you would be concerned with someone putting out false information on the company but you dont seem to be concerned, and as a CEO you should be doublely concerned, but instead you join in.