Repeat: Shareholders know me and know I have done extensive due diligence and cite documentation. Definitely not Management , but like the wins. Do not like manipulation.
Bashers also use several phony monikers. , shareholders know. Include Public info 7 years later , Sept 2017, Motion from DOE is NOT the SEC. DOE one of 5 divisions. Try and keep up. Case Dismissed Dude , but keep whining. No one cares, case dismissed.
The reason shareholders like me have no regard for bashers is what kind of man children are on a chatroom 24/7/365, including weekends with multiple monikers with out of context crap from 4 obvious monikers/2bashers/non-or negligible shareholders. Repeat: BS 7 years later from DOE , division sanctioned for overreaching many times. You guys are so Pathetic!
Also OJ died a couple months ago—he like all non-shareholders never keep up. That is why they bash on the OTC. No proper job.
Speaking of lying. There was no lying by the Company as #1 below and the 10-K for 2014 and thereafter. That made subject moot. The clarification was missing from earlier TopJetFuel smoke which I corrected. Never mentioned again . Case Final Order of Dismissal to close Standing Order of Dismissal of Nov 12 2019. Cannot do revisionist history —case won. Chronology always bashers weak points.
Repeat : multiple monikers trying to twist irrelevancies. FYI—Company used as example of enforcement overreach 7 years ago following the Motion and it went away. Never mentioned again.
FYI—Regulations state Full transcript not available to public, only to parties in action. Extracts available in DOE Motion which are public information as are 10-Ks and 10Q’s. But bashers waste everyone’s time with nonsense that was actually positive in final result. Made Company’s point of DOE overreach. Are there any adults here? Only defamers and liars. DBMM always prevails.
FACTS:
1. Officers of DBMM have never traded /sold any shares.
2. Late filings overreach add on by Enforcement in Motion only one time . Moot and ignored by Dismissal and Judge.
3. Never mentioned again, repeat never by SEC , the Commission, nor Judges.
4. Contained in 2014 DBMM 10-K public info thereafter Company files so what is point?
5. No one cares. No one, judge new evidence from DBMM under Confidential Cover in Jan 2018 and he announced such in SEC Release.
6. LTIs funding of cashflow financing Oct 2017 and continuing to growth since Dismissal
6. Bashers embarrass themselves desperate for the gotcha that never comes.
7. Yet still here whining, chasing new investors with defamation. Dicey thin ice, IMO.
While DBMM just gets one win after another .
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
