InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

SYTI

05/05/24 8:45 PM

#2692 RE: stealofadeal #2691

So the $500,000 worth of .12 subscriptions isn't considered dilution to you? The $900,000 Pfd C shares at .12 isn't considered dilution?
The demand note of $1.4m, how's that getting paid back?
Answer something bro;-)
icon url

SYTI

05/06/24 8:52 AM

#2693 RE: stealofadeal #2691

Sure do learn about certain posters, here one may tout share structure and then on a different board feels can "bank on a stock" who has 5,728,905,549

SO have a strong belief in company structure on one board and then on a different board its out the window?

Seems a tad hypocritical?
icon url

SYTI

05/06/24 11:50 AM

#2695 RE: stealofadeal #2691

No dilution??...the company sold $1,016,000 worth of .12 shares more than they sold in gross product revenues LMFAO

ALL in financials but apparently some can't read them accurately ;-)

$1,400,000 in .12 shares and $384,000 revs (to help explain above number, subtract one from the other)

BUT no "dilution"
icon url

SYTI

05/06/24 4:25 PM

#2696 RE: stealofadeal #2691

Share structure irrelevant if your product is too expensive for market.
Conboy knows this but knows marketing BS will make him $
NOT breaking into the Gov't boys club with an expensive alternative. IF it was viable Perimeter Solutions chemists would have made it long long ago...end of story !

tri potassium citrate is an environmentally friendly option, it may not be the most economical choice for large-scale forest fire fighting.

The most cost-effective forest fire retardant being used today is likely the traditional phosphate-based retardants. These have been the industry standard for decades due to their effectiveness and relatively low cost. The US Forest Service has used these retardants extensively, and they remain a common choice for large-scale fire suppression efforts.
Another product that has been approved for ground application and might be cost-effective due to its durability and preventative application is PHOS-CHEK FORTIFY. It’s a hydrogel-based retardant that can be applied early in the fire season and remains effective until significant rainfall1. This could potentially reduce the need for repeated applications, making it a cost-effective solution in the long run.