Replies to post #220791 on DD Support Board and Research Team

[lucky, mydog]

Additionally, "NoDummy" is included on the list due to past actions, including sharing personal information and false accusations{

lol. idiot. what false allegations, jake? sharing personal info is not a crime. not only do you have no standing, you're just plain wrong.

[Homebrew]

Waaa-waaa....Stinky-Pinky crybaby

[janice shell]

I'm sorry you've been subjected to all that, Jake. Threats are never the answer in any situation. And those sent to your family members are appalling. Unfortunately, the growth of the internet has not come without societal problems.

It's been a long time since I looked at IFLM, and I don't think I've ever read the SONG board. But I do know that nodummy and most of the rest of us on the DD board don't dig for or spread personal information, and certainly don't deal in threats or harassment. In addition, IHub's been pretty quiet since the OTC market got whacked by the amendments to Rule 15c2-11. I think it's reasonable to say that the threats you're receiving now are from people who're posting about you and your companies now. And that those people are probably active on other sites.

[lucky, mydog]

i heard that some people are saying that you were grown in a lab and don't have an actual grandmother

[SCAMBUSTERKING]

This is interesting, you indicated that you carefully reviewed the list, leaving out Janice for well thought out reasons, and that this is about going after people who made threats against your family.

Yet, the list includes numerous bot accounts and people who have never posted about you, your family, or your company, including:
1) Fake OTC influencer bot accounts, such as @_MoonMarKt__ which is suspended, @TarasBulls808s which is a fake TaraBull account which never tweeted about you, fake @anya_tradies, and tens of other random bot accounts
2) Account that have never posted AT ALL, let alone about you, your family, or your company
3) Accounts that at most liked a post mentioning you or you company
4) Hundreds of accounts that have done NOTHING you have mentioned as your "reason."
5) People who said something you didn't like years ago unrelated to whatever you are suing for now. You indeed straight up stated here you had no idea if he has stated something lately, you decide to name him in a subpoena anyways.

A serious lawsuit not meant to simply be a SLAPP lawsuit for intimidation purposes would have listed the exact names of accounts that made these claims and providing proof these threats did occur linking them to the names. Instead, you just make claims and without care list a bunch of random people that do not fit what you said happened at all. That is reckless, that is improper, that absolutely discredits what you have stated here.

People who didn't even know who you or your company are are posting asking what is going on. It is incredible what lengths you will go through to hide the fact you have violated the 144 drip rule limiting affiliates from selling >1% of the OS over any given 3 month period. You sold ~750M over ~6 month period per your own filings and court documents in 2023. Meanwhile, you were complaining about people selling and flipping, saying dilution isn't happening and is a "false narrative." Weird, because the only reason the PPS kept going down is you selling shares.



What is even worse, is.. you kept doing it into 2024. When you went to court, didn't tell the judge you were unable to get a 3a10 exemption because you were an affiliate (you cited this in your previous case), and had already had the attempt dismissed WITH prejudice after you begged the judge to not get you in trouble for UPL. But, that didn't stop you, converting billions of shares and selling a ton of them. Again, breaking the 144 drip rule. And what did you do? Oh, that is right, you blamed flipper and then went on to dump hundreds of millions to billions of shares tanking the stock price while pumping fake revenue numbers.



But let's not sue my opinion to assess the badness of this situation, heck, let's not even use the SEC's CLEAR rules and regulations. Let's go ahead and use your own assessment of what you did and the implications of it:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1786775952954921331

Not great Bob... feel free to peruse the part you keep repeating over and over about the 3a10 being used for capital raises...



Full thread here:

https://x.com/FLOWInvesting/status/1783935646773440907

Odd this account is on the list, given they have said nothin about your family or made any threats. The only reason they are on it is because they have the best DD on your and your abuse of the ticker for personal gain, specifying exactly how what you did was not allowed. No threats, no comments about your family, just links to SEC cases and regulations, your filings, your court cases.

This lawsuit is indeed a SLAPP lawsuit, it doesn't end well for people that abuse the court system.

What makes it worse, is you play the victim card here while creating hundreds of victims because you can't deal directly with the SEC violations you have caused. In fact, you are in contact with individuals ACTUALLY doing what you claim is being done to you with the intent to dox this individual to his harassers who just last week sent death threats to them. The emails from your lawyer to the person making the death threats have been obtained:

https://twitter.com/FLOWInvesting/status/1786494079917850960

Again, what you have stated and the lawsuit + subpoena's you have filed don't match. They are in fact evidence of the exact opposite, you don't like what someone says, they like the wrong post, etc and they end up in one of your SLAPP lawsuits who's sole intent is to harass folks using their 1st amendment rights to provide meaningful and relevant criticism about a public official and his company. We know what a lawsuit SHOULD have look liked, you instead did none of that, opting to sue investors for simply existing, liking a post, and for some reason a bunch of random bots now suspended.

No one takes you, your company, or your lawsuits seriously. You left out the request for $1M. I will not tolerate such reprehensible behavior, harassment, threats, by you.

SONG will be no bid with a .0001 ask by the end of year, for the sole reason of the CEO, you, dumping billions of shares on to the market, illegally, in violation of Rule 144 and the 3a10 exception. Bringing more unwanted attention to you and your company you otherwise would not be getting. Again, this is crystal clear, you are in fact not doing this for your stated reasons, instead most accounts you named were not even aware of the things you stated let alone participated in them.

This is careless, reckless, reprehensible, harassment, and gaslighting. Grown ups know better, children do not.

[satter]

I want to provide you with complete transparency regarding the recent developments

First, to be clear I am totally against any threats of violence made. But the problem is there is no transparency. Your complaint, unless exhibits were entered?, provided no examples of these threats. Surely if there have been death threats then this is a law enforcement situation to be pursued, on those specific targets, not a Civil action seeking personal information on hundreds who do not fit that profile.

Our objective is not financial gain; instead, we are seeking subpoenas to unveil the identities of those behind certain accounts.

Our aim is to obtain orders of protection to cease these reprehensible behaviors

You are seeking damages, including special, punitive damages, incidental damages, consequential damages, attorney fees, and costs. You point out that the relief sought is more than $1,000.000.