The case is farmed out to a high profile MA based firm. The in house counsel is not actively managing the case at all Even Pfizer uses outside counsel to manage a case like this which requires specific expertise which they simply don't keep in house
Nathaniel Gardiner retired at what could be considered the pinnacle of his career with Enanta, during a high profile lawsuit with Pfizer? Who is your clown?
So do you think he ran away because ENTA might lose the case and he couldn't bear the embarrassment? Do you think the patents and patent violation claims themselves have no bearing, and all that matters is who is doing the arguing?