Replies to post #188731 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[Nrdc92]

Maybe I misinterpreted, but I did not read his comments as “belittling” Lebby. To the contrary, he seemed to me to have been very complimentary of Lebby; but felt, in his opinion, that TFLN would rule the day. Definitely not disparaging.

[More Belgians]

Let's get this straight:

( all as per your own words)

You are a very emotional type of "investor", you are only into stocks since a few years, you were long originally, ( decided to buy only after "watching some presentations and reading this forum") then you got impatient and emotional, sold and went short....although you (again as per your own words) "didn't know much about shorting or any other tricks of the trade"

Now you are making claims about Mark L and Dr. Lebby...only trying to influence other people, worthless claims, nothing to do with reality.....

You are a typical short, stupid and/or dishonest and probably both.....

[rikkie]

Apparently not everyone has patience!

[Rocking Jack]

When the stakes are so high, one way or another, you'll find lots of people with agendas. You and Mark L. are likely to not support the same polymer that most of us here do believe will win in the end. Fine. I wonder though whether the peoples that are "shorting your agenda" are also so noisy on the site where your polymer is being discussed. Is anybody here shorting Paul's Polymer?😂

[prototype_101]

WRONG!! the real question is how marky boy comes up with TFLN as his choice to win as the next-gen material when it pretty much sucks in comparison the LWLG materials!! here YOU MUST HAVE MISSED IT because I already asked teddybear to talk to his bff about it

Ha!!! Too funny!!! here teddybear are the FACTS, why don't you get your bff marky boy to answer to the following,

First of all, please tell me if marky boy is being paid to promote TFLN, sure seems like it to me!!!

I only ask this question because TFLN pales by comparison to LWLG Polymers in EVERY competitive aspect, FYI here are the FACTS

1) TFLN is MUCH larger (8 TFLN fit in the space LWLG fits 120 or more)
2) TFLN requires more Voltage and thus CANNOT eliminate the power hungry & expensive Driver chip like LWLG's Polymers
3) TFLN has much high Optical Losses (extremely important in limiting DSP needs)
4) TFLN is not nearly as compatible in Standard Silicon Foundries (if at all!!)
5) and then there was this comment coming back on TFLN from a Silicon Foundry reported by Michael Lebby in the 2023 ASM presentation was this "At our foundry we are worried about the investment into TFLN: it may only be for one generation"

So the FACTS are that LWLG Polymers are clearly the TONS THE BEST solution HANDS DOWN for the Industry today!!!

oh, and btw, many here believe this was the kerrisdale poster that that came on to this message board after the FALSE & MISLEADING report that YOU continued to quote a thousand times even after it was REBUKED SUMMARILY in an SEC FILING!!!!