Replies to post #792858 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

thank you
can you relink - if each case is listed
otherwise - bluntly - I will think and believe ALITO made a mistake as I hate him anyway

[Wise Man]

"every circuit ***to review*** 4617f"

BEEN THERE, DONE THAT.
Judge Willett (Collins case. 5th Cir.) already said that the FHFA exceeded its powers with the NWS dividend. What lies behind your theme of 4617(f).


And yesterday I already commented what the UPMOST judge, justice Alito, replied to judge Willett's half-baked ruling, contending that it must be upheld the prerequisite of Rehabilitation of FnF (Separate Account plan).
This is why it's been considered that they were synchronized (their rulings are more like patches, to extend the announcement of the only Fanniegate resolution)

#FANNIEGATE ATTYS BRING 4617f UP AGAIN
Courts step in if FHFA exceeds its powers.
Willett's half-baked ruling amending Sweeney's ("authorized by this section" deleted)said YES w/ the NWS div, in a Hindes-moment(the 10%div too)
Alito corrected Willett:"Rehab FnF...Can't you read?" pic.twitter.com/2nBGuAxvJ3

— Conservatives against Trump (@CarlosVignote) April 29, 2024