InvestorsHub Logo

Whalatane

04/28/24 12:52 PM

#423633 RE: CaptBeer #423632

Capt https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050276

The risk reduction ( and therefore potential cost savings ) in this subgroup is dramatic .
The event lines separate very early and separation is very evident at the 3 yr pt.
Yes we would need buy end to some extent from the Health Depts in Germany , France and Italy.

My understanding is that CAD patients are a lot more adherent to taking their meds after being admitted for a CV event .
Recruiting should be a lot easier and quicker then R-IT since theres a lot of followup with these patients in the first months following a PCI

Analysis Event (%) Rate/1000 pt-yr
Event (%) Rate/1000 pt-yr
Coronary Revascularization
1st occurrence event 376 (9.20) 22.50
544 (13.30) 33.67
2nd occurrence event 66 (1.61) 3.77
3rd occurrence event 14 (0.34) 0.80
130 (3.18) 7.57
38 (0.93) 2.19

Kiwi

Whalatane

04/28/24 1:13 PM

#423634 RE: CaptBeer #423632

Capt. I linked data from the supplemental section of the Revasc analysis but it didn't format easily ....If you look you will see a dramatic reduction in needing a repeat revascularisation for those on Vascepa
Kiwi

north40000

04/28/24 2:35 PM

#423635 RE: CaptBeer #423632

You are correct, and kiwi continues to be out to lunch in failing to acknowledge a line in one of DMC8’s links today that the Vascepa market is being retained because freedom from pancreatitis has not been shown by a generic clinical trial. The generics have the burden of proof.