InvestorsHub Logo

Edward

04/27/24 2:36 PM

#88337 RE: BokehRebl #88336

TOO FUNNY.

Vxit is a SCAM.



Nothing that is communicated from Vxit can be believed.

That's what SCAMS do.

Stock is selling for .0008.

Not one Long term stockholder is making money in VXTR,

2.8 billion shares O/S

No sales.

Enough said.

mailman69

04/27/24 7:29 PM

#88341 RE: BokehRebl #88336

Here is a some facts ceo makes no money off of shares traded in the open market!!

There has been no big selling of shears from the company itself for a long time,
CEO put up his own money to keep things going!!!
The ceo make no money until the shares go up and can sell shares
Even if shares go up the ceo can’t sell shares fast because the shares would drop over night !!
There is no scam here and no one in at the
Top is making millions on Vxit!!!

He is trying to make something work and I to am not happy how long it is taking
But this is not a scam

Edward

04/28/24 4:50 AM

#88347 RE: BokehRebl #88336

Class is back in session!




Yes, but i am not the one to be schooled.


HMMMM...

Let's see.

My loss in VXIT is Nothing (zero)

How much are you losing in thousands? Round to the nearest thousand!


Here is some schooling:

This is who shareholders of VXIT CEO James Katzaroff are dealing with:

http://www.clippercorporatepartners.com/2019/02/vivos-slays-dragon-initially-posted.html

(former company he was the CEO with.)

"Unfortunately, the company's future had been mortgaged through toxic debt. The toxic debt was piled onto the company by former CEO, James Katzaroff, almost exclusively to pay the salaries of his wife and himself, as well as take a bunch of pointless and expensive trips to places like Russia, albeit purportedly for the company's benefit, but to no avail. The Katzaroffs had taken as much as a million dollars out of Vivos over the final few years of Jim's tenure as CEO.

Under Jim Katzaroff, the company made very little progress while having its viability placed into jeopardy, all in the name of a paycheck. Katzaroff could have raised money under more responsible terms, but taking on toxic debt was easier and the simpler route to ensure he and his wife got paid. Toxic borrowing is almost always for the benefit of management, so that they are ensured that their pockets are lined--under the guise of salary and usually for doing nothing--without regard to the retail shareholder.

In short, Katzaroff was in breach of his fiduciary duties to Vivos"