InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BonnieMac

04/25/24 2:51 AM

#197406 RE: archilles #197405

I don't understand this sentence: "I am interested in going after the products that Charles and Chandra because they each ran away and were taking these products with them which were created with ENZC shareholders monies." WHAT "products" did Charles & Chandra [run away] with?
icon url

I-Glow

04/25/24 10:50 AM

#197414 RE: archilles #197405

In 2006 Patent No. 7,479,538 was assigned to The Zhabilov Trust. Zhabilov was the inventor and it was never owned by ENZC.

In 2009 U.S. Patent No. 8,066,982 was assigned to The Zhabilov Trust and Zhabilov was the inventor - ENZC never owned the patent.

Plus, it is obvious that the patents have no commercial value.

What makes you think the patents have any value - ENZC is a scam.

"What made ENZC attractive to other pharmaceuticals and to shareholders were the products that Charles and Chandra created during their employment at ENZC. These products must be returned to ENZC or the shareholders to make ENZC attractive or whole again or the shareholders must be paid for what they are worth if they are not coming back to ENZC."

What? "What made ENZC attractive to other pharmaceuticals..."

Which pharmaceuticals found ENZC attractive?

ENZC is a non-reporting OTC company - by definition that means they are a scam.

You believed the company hype without doing any DD.

You can follow the insiders around as they will do another OTC scam.

There was never any AI platform for drug discovery.

The SAGA deal was for pumping purposes only.

IG