Let's consider: my posts repeatedly discuss and cite facts.
You: create a limited positive narrative based on ignoring multiple glaring facts, where instead you focus on Xeriant press releases that make only unsupported claims. The facts show unsupported claims is Xeriant's modus operandi.
So, with your intent to create a rosy picture, based on unsupported facts, you know your conclusions to be lame. To cover for your unsupported shaky ground FAKE narrative with lame conclusions you resort to slinging insults. You think your barking is the end all, but that further establishes your presence as lame and your Xeriant narrative as unfounded.