Replies to post #129477 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[Stef07]

loophole can you break that number down to cases that were overturned because of pending IPRs and EPRs were rulings came in after trial, those IPRs and EPRs can ruin a case when lost. VP has defeated everything these Giants threw at them. Never lost a claim

[chazzy1]

Loophole lawyer, you wrote, “For patent cases that were appealed to a federal appellate court and terminated from 2021 to 2023 with a decision on the merits of the appeal, 34% were ultimately reversed. Sometimes a settlement is worth considering."

Yes, sometimes a settlement IS worth considering, however, if only 34% of those appeals were reversed, that means that a whopping 66% of those appeals failed to achieve a reversal at the appellate level. Those odds favor the plaintiff in Albright's Western District court.
Another point that should not be overlooked is that in the aftermath of a court victory in Waco, according to statistics, the pps of the prevailing party would likely skyrocket to unprecedented levels, allowing investors to take sizable profits off the table while waiting for the appeals process to play out (assuming that Judge Albright's decision left any grounds for an appeal). I would take a settlement but would prefer a court victory for VPLM, as this would likely become a strong inducement for the remaining infringers to settle (or even buy out VP).
BTW, I always enjoy your insightful and informative posts.