Tuesday, April 23, 2024 11:41:43 AM
Yes, sometimes a settlement IS worth considering, however, if only 34% of those appeals were reversed, that means that a whopping 66% of those appeals failed to achieve a reversal at the appellate level. Those odds favor the plaintiff in Albright's Western District court.
Another point that should not be overlooked is that in the aftermath of a court victory in Waco, according to statistics, the pps of the prevailing party would likely skyrocket to unprecedented levels, allowing investors to take sizable profits off the table while waiting for the appeals process to play out (assuming that Judge Albright's decision left any grounds for an appeal). I would take a settlement but would prefer a court victory for VPLM, as this would likely become a strong inducement for the remaining infringers to settle (or even buy out VP).
BTW, I always enjoy your insightful and informative posts.
Recent VPLM News
- ILUS International Inc (ILUS) Sees 557% Q1 Revenue Increase, Begins National Exchange Uplist Procedure for Subsidiaries and Company • InvestorsHub NewsWire • 06/05/2023 12:15:00 PM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM