InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BBANBOB

04/07/24 8:44 AM

#725659 RE: mufa #725657

Mufa

""they can go and sue for fraud .""

WHAT FRAUD ??????? the POR /GSA was done the way it was as a COVER YOUR REAR TYPE THING imho.
They told all up front the payout matrix (CYA) and they told all you either elect to participate or you do not(CYA)
Now sure they can sue because of anything but they would not win.
If they went into court imho the judge would make quick work of them by simply asking, were you informed of the payout matrix and that if you did not elect to participate that you would get nothing, their answer would have to be YES I WAS BUT, the Judge would then say there is no but and case dismissed. imho
icon url

KeyKey

04/07/24 11:44 AM

#725668 RE: mufa #725657

@mufa: Ok, let us assume that lodas didn't release .. ok ..
But would this really be a reason to post here ongoing .. day by day ?
And again: Where does lodas have all this knowledge from ??
Still wondering.
Well, I am not a native english speaker .. ok ..
But also when I would be a native speaker, it would not understand all the things which are written in the court documents ..
You need to be familiar with this business also when lodas will not agree.
So who is lodas ? Is it an US-finance lawyer ?? And how old is he really ?
We probably can still just guess .. But something seems to be strange ..
Anyhow .. We should find out the next months .. or LG is right and it needs further time till Jamie retires .. So one extension after another after another after another .. And lodas just insists on his documents and nothing else beyond .. strange strange strange .. so he might know more but he will not tell .. so again the question to @lodas .. do you have another source than just reading information from documents ?? Did you speak to somebody from FDIC or whoever ? And again: Are you a lawyer ? :-) Which profession do you have ? Thanks