InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

zdog

04/06/24 9:11 AM

#186279 RE: zdog #186278

Sorry, I left out Dan, your posts are worthless too.
icon url

Nrdc92

04/06/24 9:31 AM

#186281 RE: zdog #186278

Idiotic question, Z, because it’s not my job or any shareholder’s to answer those questions. That’s the job of management. A job, btw, that they have failed at miserably. Providing accurate timelines and managing expectations rests with ML. Maybe you can get him for once to be candid about where the company stands on commercialization.
icon url

LOVELWLG

04/06/24 12:18 PM

#186293 RE: zdog #186278

You are 100% correct I'm a long probably bought my shares shortly after X and have no clue or Idea how long it takes to get a new technology accepted. Thats why I go by the timeframes stated by Dr Lebby and on his many slides. My question is does Dr Lebby have a clue on how long it takes ?? He keeps missing his timelines and he has access to information and feedback minute by minute from companies, foundries and their lab and he misses the mark by a very wide margin. Tech transfer timeline alone was by last year's ASM. Thats a big miss and counting.
icon url

jeunke22

04/06/24 12:22 PM

#186295 RE: zdog #186278

Shorts are the ‘ enemy’ , ‘ competition. Why would anybody engage in civil discussion with the enemy, unless it is for surrender? Many of us here are too nice and civilized.