InvestorsHub Logo

flipper44

04/02/24 1:31 AM

#682690 RE: norisknorewards #682688

Not sure. The preprint is already out, but perhaps a final print means more to the scientific and investing community. Hard to know. You might ask someone like John Carroll at Endpoint News, even though I’m not a fan, he’d probably give you a fair read on that.

CaptainObvious

04/02/24 4:24 AM

#682694 RE: norisknorewards #682688

I think we constantly build ourselves up only to be disappointed. Not sure what's holding up the article. Approval will be the turning point, imo, but as we know the baddies will simply retrench and attack from a new position.
Bullish
Bullish

Smitty5150

04/02/24 5:04 AM

#682696 RE: norisknorewards #682688

The Nature article wont make one bit of difference in regards to the SP. For that approval is the only thing WS wants to see, because it means revenue and earnings. Nothing else will matter outside of a equity partnership or all cash deal. WS could care less about the science or the idea. Its why at one time the trashed Nvidia and Tesla as well. Once revs and earning came, so did the rising SP. These "games" are not exclusive to NWBO. Money talks, BS walks. Unless they are backing the science with a IPO right from the start, then it off to the races. Sad, but its just the way it is.