Replies to post #341258 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Jetmek_03052]

The “meat is” DBMM has prevailed

That is pure bunk and the record clearly shows it.

DBMM has NOT "prevailed". DBMM has squeaked by. They are (for all intents and purposes) insolvent in their business operations, surviving at the whim of "LTI's". Investors who buy the stock of DBMM have no IDEA of who these "LTI's" are or even what their intent is. It looks like they are beginning to realize that these "LTI's" hold the very life of DBMM in their hands. All they have to do is to end the loans, and DBMM would fold up like a little pup tent.

Year after year goes by and DBMM continues to operate at a LOSS. Just how long will these "LTI" loans continue, in the face of these losses? It's likely that at some point they will end. I'll bet that you told these "LTI's" long ago that once your little company got by this "SEC matter", that business would come to life and DBMM would start producing. Well? If the first 10 months of operations without the "SEC matter" hanging over them is any indication, DBMM is doomed!

Poo, it is ridiculous to pawn off DBMM's underperformance on some sort of "bashing" effort. The number of investors in the world that visit this little discussion board could not POSSIBLY affect the share price of DBMM to any degree! No - DBMM's terrible performance is due to horrible management. Digital Clarity is not signing on the number of customers needed. The revenue stream is paltry and cannot support the parent company's spending. REAL investors see this CONSTANT RED INK and give DBMM the cold shoulder.

This is a FACT.

[Think1st]

My point is both sides are making money in the trading of the stock
The main business is the trading.
It cost millions to get back to trading,
Where does this money come from?
From 500 000 revenue????

taking it to 4 cents was worth millions in trading despite that the co has very little revenue from its business of digital ads etc
Thats their side business, main business is to argue with barber day and night
Imo

[Stock_Barber]

(one share is to satisfy employers)?

1 share is required to be a lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit, I have explained that, multiple times! Apparently you'll try ANY LIE to support your bogus narrative!

Tell your shorting buddies the shareholders , and others, are watching .

Thanks for the laugh...

Oh, be assured... there is "watching" going on... for sure!

There are a lot more "eyeballs" here than you can even imagine... and they aren't focused on critics! 👀

Now go run the company!