InvestorsHub Logo

learningcurve2020

03/26/24 12:10 PM

#681340 RE: BuccaneerIllusionist21 #681336

Still waiting for MHRA acceptance.

FeMike

03/26/24 12:26 PM

#681349 RE: BuccaneerIllusionist21 #681336

Don't you think that if there was no chance of MHRA approval and the vaccine was as bad as you make out it would have been rejected weeks in not months ago? It was submitted for approval in December, now almost April and still no rejection.



At risk of sounding like a FUDster (but in reality just an FYI) -

That can't happen because MHRA does not have the authority to reject an application outright. It must be reviewed by the CHM prior to being rejected. So rejection could not have come any earlier than March 20-22.

Again, not a bash, I firmly believe it will be approved. Just an FYI.

ilovetech

03/26/24 12:47 PM

#681354 RE: BuccaneerIllusionist21 #681336

It's at the top of the list of one of the most understood mechanism of action treatments in this class of treatment. There is no other modality, which has enjoyed the same amount of observational studies, and over as long a period. There have been innumerable treatment modalities approved, not only for a meager two months mOs improvement, but also, where the mechanism of action is yet to be fully understood. Despite the serious adverse events caused by many existing treatments, I'm surprised we don't have more vocal advocacy groups raising questions.

iclight

03/26/24 1:11 PM

#681358 RE: BuccaneerIllusionist21 #681336

If it was a slam dunk, then by your misguided idea of how MHRA approval works, shouldn't it have been approved by now?