Replies to post #121659 on HUMBL Inc (HMBL)

[Cinnyricinclus]

Unless you can find something definitive saying that George Sharp wanted his money back for the warrants and exercise because of the reverse split, I'm going to consider all of your conjecture as gibberish.

As you can see, Sharp even was intimately involved with the Humbl reverse split. Your speculation that Sharp was against that reverse split, but still was driving the reverse split, makes little sense.

[Cinnyricinclus]

Further, George Sharp said, " I made the conscious decision" to not tell shareholders about the reverse split because it would have caused "mass panic".

Tell me, NoMoDo, does that sound like a prudent and forthright decision on Sharp's part? Should material information be withheld from investors because an insider feels shareholders might react negatively?

I still don't understand why you're going to bat for George Sharp. Why are you defending him so vigorously?

[Cinnyricinclus]

It's great that you're shedding a tear for George Sharp and are happy that he was refunded the entire amount he spent. But what about other shareholders who purchased shares before Foote disclosed the 6 billion shares of dilution from the series B?? Shouldn't you shed a tear for those investors as well? Shouldn't those investors also be refunded all of the money they spent buying Humbl common shares?