Forgive me as I’m late to the DBMM party. I gather that “Poo” is an insider posting on IHUB? Do I have that right? Has he disclosed his position in DBMM here on this board?
In my opinion, you are wrong about the SEC and DBMM. The SEC had all the power and could have easily overturned the judges decision and revoked the stock. They did not even issue a fine. This caused this whole scenario to be dragged out for years. Maybe they expected DBMM to fold up on its own. Then out of nowhere, they come up with an internal breach and 42 companies go back to normal trading including DBMM. This was to avoid lawsuits. Who got the information in the other agency? Was it a hack? Was it insiders covering their butt? This whole mess was the fault of the SEC. They made many mistakes. Who were they protecting? We will never know. Just my opinion as nobody knows the facts.
Shareholders know that when the bashers get desperate and can’t deliver as they have promised the short sellers and bad actors , they make up fiction and claim I am management . Yet all that does is show them for who they are as shareholders know me . Their ignorance is documented, non-shareholders 24/7/365.
Anything involving legal positions you always do not understand the law or the regulations. The chronology always wrong and the events always wrong . Truly unhinged and documentation shows otherwise.
FACTS: Nov 15,2013 Reaudit mandated through no fault of the Company. To that point, Asher had been converting into shares under 2 Convertible Debentures outstanding, but reaudit rendered the Company no longer compliant. Asher could have waited until Reaudit completed to continue their conversion, instead they saw an opportunity to steal the Company.
Company lost funding with Reaudit as it occurred one year after acquisition finalized. That is why the first mitigating circumstance in later delayed filings case was the Reaudit.
Feb ,2014 Asher sued DBMM as chose to try and steal Company vulnerable as DBMM in midst of reaudit and everything in abeyance until completed. At that point, DBMM fought back and ultimately prevailed for 50% in Settlement June 2018. DBMM’s terms.
Unhinged vitriol about the Company , is vile, and is shows total ignorance about Asher motivation in stealing a 100% subsidiary company headquartered in UK. Very valuable asset . Basher Name calling gets worse as the fiction grows.
Asher falsely tried to end run but was precluded from going after Company or subsidiary shares in Consent Decree in Kramer Hope Capital Case, Oct 2016, see Undertakings posted many times , but ignored. Summary doc , last paragraph in link below.
Shareholders will always correct the lies, but no one cares about 10 years ago. All done, Company won. DBMM always prevails, long and strong. The future is win after win.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
