Replies to post #454361 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[Talon38]

Baked....in the short time on the board you have been quick with your "opinion" while Falconer has provided years of reasoned scientific background on Anavex's drugs and he is speaking from a science background. I usually don't critique others posts, but my suggestion is to stick to the science and the market's reasoned/unreasoned response and not personal critiques like this one.

[falconer66a]

Readers Beware --- Always, Everyone

...but the reality is neither you nor I nor anyone else has any idea whether the drug works "strongly."

No, that's not the reality.

Speak for yourself, without "any idea," in ignorance of the cellular physiology of both schizophrenia and Anavex 3-71. The data from both murine and human trials (as preliminary as they presentably are, Phase I study data) indicate that those data are, indeed, "strong." They worked, functioned, at very low concentrations, and without adverse events of any obviating dimension.

Like the other profuse and frequent Anavex naysayers who so helpfully post their cautionary and negating perspectives on Anavex, you seem to believe that visitors to this message board, unlike yourself, are ignorant and easily persuaded by vague or merely optimistic postings. Understand, those that read here are just as smart as you. They really don't need you or any of the other Anavex naysayers to stay protected by obtuse postings such as yours --- or any that I post. You meant well, of course. But the readers here are pretty smart, and when appropriate they will by themselves discount anything either you or I post. Everyone means well, even you and I.

[Foodman1291]

Your full of it….