Replies to post #56275 on QS Energy Inc (QSEP)

[mr_sano]

Hahaha-Learn what polarization is before you open your wiki powered mouth. Seriously you have reached peak stupidity now. You are unable to cogently explain the scientific action behind an alleged physic bending properties that you claim only Qsep has discovered and that according to you its scientific merit has proven beyond a shadow of doubt over a decade ago by Citing a flawed test that was deemed in public disclosures as flawed with no statistical significance. In fact the Sec prohibited the company from saying its tech was proven. Made them strike that from the disclosures. It doesn’t get clear than that!

Being stupid or gullible is not a crime- but defending those that duped you and thousands of other investors into buying this dogcrap is like the common denominator with shit otc companies like Qsep. You guys must get high on this shit! Your constant regurgitation of Taos shoddy engineering & explanation and constant lies and misrepresentations of the facts is a character flaw you cannot shake. I can guarantee you have never run a company in your life!

When the resident idiot Zerosnoop becomes your biggest fan friend, you can consider that you’ve reached Qsep mana or at minimum top of the pile manure you have been worshipping for decades. Tell me….when this fails again what excuse will you knuckleheads use? Better start thinking about it now. I’m guessing you’re going to blame my posts! :-) it’s what most loosers in life do. They never can admit they have failed. It’s always because someone else messed up their shell game

[zerosnoop]

Great work yet again in exposing the lying grub Sano. If authorities don't believe his nonsense & lies, nor do I or any smart investor with a high IQ.

Confusion reigns.

Once again, Sano attempts to criticize Dr. Tao. First he quotes Dr. Tao:

“When a strong electric field is applied along the flow direction in a small section of the pipeline, the suspended particles are polarized by the electric field.”



Now watch how Sano makes an error and then compounds it with the following quote:

we are to believe that the nano components of crude magically align themselves in the direction of the flow by applying a small current..although initially it stated above as a strong current. Nothing like running a strong current at 40KV through flammable liquid! What could go wrong?



Look closely. Dr. Tao refers to a strong electric field while Sano talks about a strong current as if they were the same thing. I'm not an electrical engineer but I know the difference between an electric field and current.

Since the "strong current" is fictitious what about his conclusion? In this case I will defer to TransCanada's engineers who were largely responsible for designing and building the AOT 2.0 . I think it would be safe to say that they weren't going to go with something that was likely to blow up their pipeline.

[mr_sano]

Show me where I said strong current? I would never use that term but now that your ass had been destroyed in public you are grasping for straws. Still believe crude oil is polar? What does your source all your scientific knowledge wiki say about that? Here you go:

“An oil is any nonpolar chemical substance that is composed primarily of hydrocarbons and is hydrophobic (does not mix with water) and lipophilic (mixes with other oils). Oils are usually flammable and surface active. Most oils are unsaturated lipids that are liquid at room temperature.” Wiki

[PumpersExposed]

Do you comprehend what induction is? Or how generators create current by moving a magnet along a wire, much like a charged particle in a pipe would? Do you not think what is generating said field wouldn't have a current running through it? Oh wait.. KMI's shorted out didn't it.

Electric fields are measured in V/m, not KV. So they ARE talking voltage into the pack. The field doesn't just magically pop up on it's own.

TCPL's guys were involved of course because they had to clear it for their line. No way they would dump something on with these clowns say so. Doesn't mean they validated it at that point or tweaked it to be 'better' as that was for ZERO to prove.

Almost seems like Cecil should have stayed on the PRCI loop for the time he had available to him eh? Oh well, there's always the Haven Flow loop LOL!!

[zerosnoop]

Thanks for posting the FACTS & the TRUTH

Confusion reigns.

Once again, Sano attempts to criticize Dr. Tao. First he quotes Dr. Tao:

“When a strong electric field is applied along the flow direction in a small section of the pipeline, the suspended particles are polarized by the electric field.”



Now watch how Sano makes an error and then compounds it with the following quote:

we are to believe that the nano components of crude magically align themselves in the direction of the flow by applying a small current..although initially it stated above as a strong current. Nothing like running a strong current at 40KV through flammable liquid! What could go wrong?



Look closely. Dr. Tao refers to a strong electric field while Sano talks about a strong current as if they were the same thing. I'm not an electrical engineer but I know the difference between an electric field and current.

Since the "strong current" is fictitious what about his conclusion? In this case I will defer to TransCanada's engineers who were largely responsible for designing and building the AOT 2.0 . I think it would be safe to say that they weren't going to go with something that was likely to blow up their pipeline.