InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BIOChecker4

02/21/24 6:11 PM

#452404 RE: plexrec #452401

Most here assume peer-reviewed papers are always positive and that any paper peer reviewed Anavex paper will be definitive. However, it is not necessarily true that peer-reviewed papers are the final word.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/
https://s4be.cochrane.org/blog/2018/01/16/peer-review-and-publication-does-not-guarantee-reliable-information/
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/critical-thinking-health-and-nutrition-general-science/finding-paper-pubmed-does-not-mean-paper-any-good

There are lots more like this.

I’m not saying Anavex’s peer-reviewed paper (if it is ever published) will be flawed. I’m only suggesting a healthy dose of skepticism.

DOG bless,