Yes and no. There are different grades of SST. I do a lot of work in the process industries in corrosive environments with corrosive chemicals. In one environment I had experience with there were a lot of airborne contaminants (including chlorine) present. I would always specify 316 SST for instruments housings etc. which contains 2% Molybdenum (316SST is more costly than 304SST). 316 SST has much better corrosion resistance than does 304 or 301 Stainless. In this environment a lesser grade just would not hold up and was worse than epoxy painted aluminum. (painted aluminum was a poor choice as CL2 reacts with aluminum and paint chips/scratches would invariably expose the aluminum). Tesla uses something they call 30X stainless in the Cybertruck. According to Barron's ( https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-cybertrucks-rusting-fixes-f10209fb )
Here is more info on various grades Stainless steel and I wouldn't be surprised to learn Tesla is using the cheapest form of stainless steel possible or possibly some new non standard version:
I do think Tesla missed the boat on this one. They get the strength from the steel being cold rolled not it being stainless. (Does the 30X grade mean it's rolled 30 times?) Supposedly the Stainless steel was to provide corrosion resistance but the grade they picked is clearly causing issues. Personally if I had one of these Cybertrucks I would be pretty angry. Tesla should have known about this corrosion issue. Any traditional car manufacturer warranties against rust. Tesla marketing led one to believe the truck was not only strong but corrosion resistant. I bet you see a class action suit get some traction. Or maybe this is one more reason why Cybertruck production will becomes short lived.