You come up with a half-baked idea that one Board member is stabbing the company in the back by aligning with the shorts via loaning them his shares. Then you demand that the company prove that didn't happen. In my book that makes you a nutter because there is no way in hell the company would ever have any need to reply to you. Oh btw I forgot to mention that one of your key pieces of evidence is that the member in question is/was in the finance business and according to you 'these financer types cannot be trusted, and a high percentage of them have major ethical problems.". That makes you a complete asshole willing and able to slander a whole class of business people.
The fact that you can imagine some garbage doesn't make it credible. That is how the shorts operate - make up nonsense at random, throw it against the MB and see who is foolish enough to pay attention to them. There are a lot of inexperienced and gullible retail investors out there, that is true. Also folks who are very frustrated and more than willing make up anything to find anybody specific to be angry at.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
