InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BBANBOB

02/08/24 12:51 PM

#723032 RE: BBANBOB #723031

Any that think the likes of TEPPER, SAVITZ, BONDERMAN, ect would actually negotiate their PRIORITY POSITIONS IN TO ONE of being in a subordinate position, literally has to be 100% NUTS

THAT WOULD MAKE NO SENSE WHAT SO EVER
icon url

Large Green

02/08/24 1:41 PM

#723036 RE: BBANBOB #723031

BBANBOB, here is a poster who ignores certain case-altering filings but expects investors to believe his interpretation over the court-issued filings and rulings. Here are just a few of the court rulings and filings to indicate who owns the actual former WaMu Estate.

1) On the (ED) Effective Date of 3/19/2012 there was an (OC) Ownership Change that canceled ALL former common and preferred prospectuses including ALL associate documents

2) A WMIH 8K filing on 8/01/2012 that explained preferred and common equity interests ownership rights of 75/25. NOTICE, it says Preferred Equity Interests and Common Equity Interests

3) Obviously, if the case were the way some wanted it here there would be dual WaMu Estate ownership rights with the preferred and common prospectuses if those were NOT canceled then new stock issued to those investors who signed timely releases by 3/2012. This could NEVER happen in Delaware bankruptcy cases as once an opinion is issued by the court the ownership rights of the former WaMu Estate would carry through to ALL estate assets whether is Safe Harbor or NOT as again there would be multiple ownership rights over the very same assets

4) These are just a few of the most bizarre ignored filings that changed the ownership rights of these former WaMu cases




,,,