Replies to post #669116 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[FeMike]

LP stated they intend to proceed on combination trials once maa cemented. Some or all of the trials she was referring to were already conceptually announced years ago, but cost
made them wait until L maa cemented. These combo trials have been in active discussions with several parties for over one year. This is all public information. LP intends these trials to be financially beneficial for NWBO and its shareholders.

Yeh buddy I know your stance. News on trials coming soon. Unless it doesn’t.

As I told you the last time we had this discussion, we will regroup in 3 months. Give me your excuses then, don’t waste my time now promising me news is soon cause LP said so (she didn’t).

[FeMike]

LP stated they intend to proceed on combination trials once maa cemented.

LP’s lawyers stated that now that the MAA is cemented all of the company execs will be spending essentially all of their time the next 3 months on inspections.

Who am I to believe? The most costly lawyers in the country making sworn statements to judges? Or Flipper? What a conundrum.

Ah crap never mind - just realized flippers angle. they negotiated everything over the past year and the deal is already done! They can announce whenever they want! They’re just waiting for dramatic effect.

Well I guess we’ll get that PR tomorrow. Or next week. Or next month. Stay tuned.

[meirluc]

LP stated they intend to proceed on combination trials once maa cemented.

While I applaud LP's intent, I don't know what she meant by a "cemented MAA". Did she
refer to an approved MAA or perhaps a post CHM MAA, which could be the time when the company
would be confident that the MAA approval is inevitable and will occur within a reasonable amount of time?

[Single Stock]

Flipper , Yes she did say about the joint trials being good for shareholders but heavens knows what that means.

1. It could mean the partner takes all costs , I`d say that`s 80% likely , which of course would be positive for the stock but
certainly not positive enough to break the shackles of warrant conversion and dilution and to get us off this horror story exchange.

2. It could mean as many have suggested an upfront payment but upfront payments are not handed out as a
thank you, they are most often tied to a licensing deal in the event the joint trials actually works but
my problem again there is I cant find a single instance of a company with 20 employees getting anything more
than <$25m.

We need an institutional investor to come in in tandem with announcements like joint trials,

All we need is one buyer with maybe $150m to invest ( which is miniscule in the real money / long only world)
buying on the open market and investing directly as Woodford did and that sees us at $4 ++ in short order .

As for why we have not had that is anyones guess but , there certainly there is no positive spin to the fact we are 100% retail..

I could expand on that but you ( or certainly some others ) would call me a short .