Sorry I failed to mention something else in my earlier message. Your figures were conservative as you indicated a substantial percentage weren't having surgery. In some cases this may have been because the tumor was considered inoperable, but in others I believe it was based on the belief that something else was working. If DCVax-L proves to be significantly better than whatever the something else is, don't you think that many of the patients who could choose surgery, along with DCVax-L will do so.
The other question, which may be answered years from now with DCVax-Direct, is, in patients with tumors deemed to be inoperative, would it be possible to actually extract sufficient material from the tumor to make DCVax-L. I guess I'm suggesting something like a cross between needle biopsy and liposuction to remove sufficient mass to get the vaccine made. I'm asking, not saying it can be done, but I believe that today many things can be done with robotics that get into places that previously required major surgery with tiny specialized instruments.
I guess what I'm saying is with evidence that DCVax-L, perhaps with other therapeutics, is by far the most effective way of fighting these cancers, can we find a way to reach nearly all discovered with it.
Of course everything I'm saying about brain cancer should be equally true of other solid cancers after DCVax-L is proven to be more effective in treating it as well. I'd frankly hate to see NWBO bought out on the strength of brain cancer alone if a little more time will show it should be applied to many other solid cancers. I'm fine with a BP partner helping us get their sooner.
Some people think I'm kidding, but if NWBO remained independent, and if both DCVax's prove effective against most cancers, a trillion dollar market cap is not out of the question. It could easily take a decade or more, but I prefer allowing it to grow that way then some short term buyout, even at figures of $45 billion, or more. I would suspect that if we ever reached a trillion market cap we might have as many as 3 to 5 billion shares outstanding, such dilution wouldn't bother me if we had that sort of growth.
Gary